FIDIC    International Federation
of Consulting Engineers
Home  About us  Site map  Contact FIDIC 
New  News  Directories  Calendars  Products  Account   Basket 
Skip navigation links
BOOKSHOP
EVENTS
USER FORUMS
INTERNAL
YPs
REGIONS
FEDERATION
Skip navigation links
User Forums
Contracts
Home
Updates Forum
FAQ
Business Practice
Account
Sign In
1999 Contracts Updates Forum 
Comments are organised by Sub-Clause, with Sub-Clauses for Clauses 3, 5 and 12 being different for the CONS, PLANT and TURNKEY contracts, and the same for ALL contracts for the other clauses.
Clauses 01-05 Clauses 06-10 Clauses 11-15 Clauses 16-20
Sign In or Create a New Account to display an "Add new discussion" button. Then either start a new discussion Topic by clicking on the "Add new discussion" button (a Category must be selected). Or Reply to a discussion Topic by clicking on a Topic. Discussions last modified before 25 December are in the Discussion Database below.

BodyFilter
Except to the extent
Delete. Insert ‘Where the instruction arises under (a) or (b) above the Contractor shall, subject to Sub-Clause 2.5 pay to the Employer all costs arising from this failure. (‘Except to the extent’ seems confusing. Work under © would not give rise to payment since it has not been done).
07.06 ALL: Remedial WorkuseradminApproved
Additional costs
Delete in Para. 2: ‘at the risk and cost of the Contractor’. Add new para at end. ‘The Contractor shall subject to Sub-Clause 2.5 pay to the Employer any additional costs reasonably incurred by the Employer in carrying out the tests.
09.02 ALL: Delayed TestsuseradminApproved
Taking Over
Amend as ‘Except as stated in Sub-Clause 9.4, the Works or any Section shall be taken over by the Employer when (i) such Works have been completed in accordance with the Contract except for any minor work or defects as allowed in sub-paragraph (a) below and (ii)…’ (Need to include Sections; no need to refer back to 8.2).
10.01 ALL: Taking Over of the Works and SectionsuseradminApproved
Clearly state remedies
This should clearly state the Employer's remedies rather than referring to 11.4. This provision should simply include the relevant wording from 11.4 (c).
09.04 ALL: Failure to Pass Tests on CompletionJerome DunneApproved
Exclusive remedy for delay
FIDIC is no doubt aware that in English law liquidated damages are usually held to be an exclusive remedy for delay and, in the event of termination the usual position is that liquidated damages will no longer be payable by the Contractor (the Employer having removed the opportunity for the Contractor to complete). Of course at the date of termination there may be "accrued" programme delay where delay damages have not yet fallen due (e.g. in a situation where the Contractor is 10 weeks behind schedule at the date of termination but only 1 week of delay damages has fallen due).

This often gives rise to discussion as to whether unliquidated damages can be claimed for the losses resulting from this "accrued" delay and if so, whether such unliquidated damages are capped to the agreed liquidated damages figure. It is submitted that these questions are usually decided as a matter of construction of the specific clause in question and we do not believe that Sub-Clause 8.7 is completely clear on this point.

In the second paragraph the clause provides that the liquidated delay damages sum shall "be the only damages due from the Contractor for such default [delay] other than in the event of termination under Sub-Clause 15.2…".

Therefore, in the event of termination the clause contemplates that additional damages can be claimed from the Contractor for the default of delay; the question is, what are these additional damages?

This provision could mean that (1) in the event of termination prior to completion of the Works unliquidated damages could be claimed for the breach (delay); or (2) that in the event of termination arising from the delay pursuant to Sub-Clause 15 (c)  the Employer can claim additional costs pursuant to 15.4 (additional costs of completing the works etc.) or (3) both (1) and (2).

FIDIC should therefore consider clarifying this drafting. We believe that following a termination pursuant to 15.2 the Employer should be able to claim unliquidated damages which include additional costs pursuant to Sub-Clause 15.4.
08.07 ALL: Delay DamagesJerome DunneApproved
Employer's right to instruct a Variation
I suggest that there be a right for the Employer to instruct acceleration in lieu of EOT. This should probably be a variation. The Contractor should have the right to object but no veto (as with the variation provision now). The cost impact should be indicated in a 13.3 proposal as now, at the option of the Employer/Engineer.
08.06 ALL: Rate of ProgressuseradminApproved
Invitation
Users of the 1999 Editions of the FIDIC Construction, Plant and Design-Build and EPC/Turnkey Contracts are invited to submit comments with the view to updating the contracts in 2009.
06.00 ALL: STAFF AND LABOUR - General CommentsuseradminApproved
BodyFilterRepliesApprover CommentsFilter
Expand/Collapse Category06.00 ALL: STAFF AND LABOUR - General Comments ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category07.06 ALL: Remedial Work ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category08.06 ALL: Rate of Progress ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category08.07 ALL: Delay Damages ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category09.02 ALL: Delayed Tests ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category09.04 ALL: Failure to Pass Tests on Completion ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category10.01 ALL: Taking Over of the Works and Sections ‎(1)
International Federation of Consulting Engineers
Box 311 - CH-1215 Geneva 15 - Switzerland
Tl +41-22-799 49 05 - Fx +41-22-799 49 01 - fidic@fidic.org - FIDIC.org