FIDIC    International Federation
of Consulting Engineers
Home  About us  Site map  Contact FIDIC 
New  News  Directories  Calendars  Products  Account   Basket 
Skip navigation links
BOOKSHOP
EVENTS
USER FORUMS
INTERNAL
YPs
REGIONS
FEDERATION
Skip navigation links
User Forums
Contracts
Home
Updates Forum
FAQ
Business Practice
Account
Sign In
1999 Contracts Updates Forum 
Comments are organised by Sub-Clause, with Sub-Clauses for Clauses 3, 5 and 12 being different for the CONS, PLANT and TURNKEY contracts, and the same for ALL contracts for the other clauses.
Clauses 01-05 Clauses 06-10 Clauses 11-15 Clauses 16-20
Sign In or Create a New Account to display an "Add new discussion" button. Then either start a new discussion Topic by clicking on the "Add new discussion" button (a Category must be selected). Or Reply to a discussion Topic by clicking on a Topic. Discussions last modified before 25 December are in the Discussion Database below.

BodyFilter
Relevant
Delete first sentence, insert ‘The Employer shall be deemed to have made available to the Contractor for his information prior to the Base Date all data on sub-surface, hydrological and environmental conditions which he believes should be taken into account.’ (Employers often do no know what is in their possession! They are not to judge what is relevant).
04.10 ALL: Site DatauseradminGordon ReesApproved
1.1.5.1 Definitions
"Materials or any other.."
01.01 ALL: DefinitionsuseradminGordon ReesApproved
1.1.2.6 Definition
Employer's Personnel means such staff of the Employer as have been notified to the Contractor as well as the Engineer and his assistants notified under Clause 3.2 and any other persons notified to the Contractor from time to time. The Contractor needs control over who comes on Site.
01.01 ALL: DefinitionsuseradminGordon ReesApproved
1.1.1.10 Definitions
Delete 'comprised', insert 'included'.
01.01 ALL: DefinitionsuseradminGordon ReesApproved
Definition 1.1.1.4
In 1.1.1.4: for the execution of the Works: Building not buying.
01.01 ALL: DefinitionsuseradminGordon ReesApproved
Silver Book: General Comments
Silver Book. The Silver Book continues to be popular among employers and project financiers (particularly in PPP/project finance situations) where it is seen as transferring significant risks regarding contract price, time and performance to the contractor. The current difficulties in the financial markets seem likely to encourage this trend still further and so we would anticipate the Silver Book’s popularity to continue. We believe, however, that the use of the Silver Book does not always give employers the fixed price, time and performance which they desire. The stark transfer of risk to the contractor can result in disputes which inevitably lead to some form of accommodation with the contractor involving additional time/monies. This is often exacerbated by concessions/amendments made during the negotiation process which introduce ambiguity to the risk transfer process and/or inadequate thought allocated to the development of Employer's Requirements.

While we do believe the Silver Book fulfils a key need we think a more nuanced approach with more time allocated to the technical documents and testing regime may produce a more certain position for the Employer. We think these points should be more clearly set out in the notes at the start of the Silver Book. We also believe that the Silver Book can produce a false economy in that competition over an initial lump sum price can drive the Contractor to try to make savings at a later point in the project. While the "lump sum" price approach is seductive to many employers and financiers it is often used for projects where this approach is not appropriate. The end result is increased cost, arguments and delay.

We also believe that the Silver Book is over-used in situations where the Conditions of Contract for Plant Design-Build may be more appropriate. Indeed, it is a rare employer, and a rare project, which fits exactly with the ideal profile offered by the Silver Book. The use of the Silver Book is most appropriate in circumstances where the Employer produces a bare performance specification, permits the Contractor to properly examine this closely and perform his own investigations and where the Employer has little expert familiarity over the technical nature of the project and permits the Contractor to organise/manage this project in his own way. The Silver Book is naturally at home in situations which involve PFI, PPP and BOT type projects or more traditional projects with significant project financing.

In our experience this "pure" situation is unusual. The Silver Book is often used when the Contractor has little time to properly investigate the performance criteria, the site or any outline design. The Employer may produce rather more than a performance specification and also seek to extend control and interfere with the design process. Often the Employer's team may have detailed experience in the construction of the particular asset and may seek to supervise heavily the construction process.
Jerome DunneApproved
Delete "immutable
Delete the words "immutable or" so the clause reads "stated in the Contract as being the responsibility of the Employer" - surely this is a more straightforward approach?

Also, Employers need to appreciate the risk if portions data or information are stated in the Contract "as being the responsibility of the Employer". Frequently concessions are made to the Contractor in negotiation in respect of this point and the consequences of these concessions are frequently not thought through to their conclusion. Leaving the Employer with responsibility for important elements of data or information can do much to undermine the basic risk allocation intended by the Silver Book. This point should perhaps be made clearer in the covering notes.
05.01 CONS: Definition of “nominated Subcontractor”Jerome DunneApproved
Performance Security is not extended
In English law we are concerned that Clause 4.2 (a) may be an unenforceable penalty. The clause appears to provide that if the Performance Security is not extended then the Employer may claim the entirety of its value. This would seem not to be a properly liquidated sum.
Consider alternative methods of dealing with this, e.g., escrow accounts, alternative security etc. It may be that the Employer's only real protection in the envisaged situation is termination and subsequent claim for losses.

If the last paragraph stands then the Performance Security might have to be returned during litigation/arbitration with the Contractor subsequently becoming insolvent while owing the Employer money. We do not believe that this approach is appropriate, further, almost all Performance Security now expires on a specified date rather than on the return of the physical documentation. We therefore do not believe that the last sentence of this provision is necessary.
04.02 ALL: Performance SecurityJerome DunneApproved
Time bar
The first paragraph - the Employer is under an obligation to consult with each Party in an endeavour to reach agreement. If he does not do so and issues a determination is this still a valid determination? We assume so but for clarity FIDIC should consider dealing with this point expressly.  Also, as with comments in respect of "notice" (see below) FIDIC should consider specifying a particular format for a determination, e.g., that the notice must say that it is a determination. This is important because the Contractor must respond within a specified time period from receipt of the determination and arguments commonly arise as to whether issues have been determined or not.
The second paragraph - as currently drafted the second paragraph of 3.5 reads "The Employer shall give notice to the Contractor of each agreement or determination with supporting particulars. Each Party shall give effect to each agreement or determination, unless the Contractor gives notice to the Employer of his dissatisfaction with a determination within 14 days of receiving it. Either Party may then refer the dispute to the DAB in accordance with Sub-Clause 20.4."
The first sentence of the second paragraph is straightforward, though one may question why the Employer should have to give notice to the Contractor (with supporting particulars) of "agreements" reached. If agreement has been achieved that is a matter of fact and the Contractor will be aware of it. If agreement has not been achieved then the Employer will make a determination and will notify the Contractor in order to comply with paragraph 1.

Problems arise with the interpretation second sentence. Does this mean that a determination can only be referred to the DAB if a notice of dissatisfaction has been served within 14 days? If service of a notice of dissatisfaction is a pre-requisite to the DAB reference then can the determination ever be revised if no notice is served e.g. if the determination is not a fair one how can this be revised within the contractual framework? If the service of a notice of dissatisfaction is not a pre-requisite to a DAB reference then what is its purpose?
We note that the Gold Book contains a new approach to clause 3.5 namely that "the Employer’s Representative shall give notice to both Parties of each agreement or determination, with supporting particulars. Each party shall give effect to each agreement or determination unless and until revised under Clause 20…".This drafting reflects the clearer drafting which is also contained within the FIDIC Red Book.
We much prefer the drafting in the Gold Book and Red Book. That said, given the risk balance of the Silver Book the drafting committee could consider (1) removing the requirement for the Employer to notify “agreements” reached and/or (2) including either a "time bar" on the period to refer any dispute in relation to a "determination" to the DAB and/or include express wording requiring the service of a notice of dissatisfaction within 14 days failing which the determination becomes binding and no reference can be made to the DAB pursuant to Sub-Clause 20.

We realise that these changes may be seen as "pro-employer" but the Silver Book in any event contains a "time bar" regarding the notification of claims in Sub-Clause 20.1 and we would consider it reasonable to extend this type of principle in clear terms to establishing pre-conditions to reference to the DAB (see also our general comments on the Silver Book).
03.05 TURNKEY: DeterminationsJerome DunneApproved
Notice of a Claim
 We understand that it has been suggested that Sub-Clause 2.5 should contain a fixed obligation placed on the Employer to issue a notice of a claim within the time period reflected in Sub-Clause 20.1 (or alternative longer time period). We strongly believe that the Silver Book should remain as drafted. Many employer's do not have the same familiarity with claims processes as contractors and we cannot see how the Contractor is disadvantaged by late submission of particulars we therefore believe that this should remain as drafted.
02.05 ALL: Employer’s ClaimsJerome DunneApproved
Approval not received
Clause 1.13 (a) and (b) - these provisions can lead to problems if particular permissions or permits/approvals are not received.
01.13 ALL: Compliance with LawsJerome DunneApproved
Extending
lause 1.10 (b) - for clarity consider including the word "extending".
01.10 ALL: Employer’s Use of Contractor’s DocumentsJerome DunneApproved
Assigning benefit
Most employers require the ability to assign the benefit of the contract and this is a common requirement of funding, the Employer may require the ability to assign to a future purchaser or as a result of group reorganisation. The narrow ability in Sub-Clause 1.7(b) to assign the rights to moneys due is not wide enough.  In our view the current restrictions on assignment do not reflect the usual market position for a contract of this nature. The Employer should be able to freely assign without consent and we believe this to be an industry standard position where English law applies (possibly with a restriction to two legal assignments but we do not believe such a restriction is necessary).
01.07 ALL: AssignmentJerome DunneApproved
Enter into an agreement
Consider including a provision to provide that the parties shall enter into a Contract Agreement (as with the approach taken in the Gold Book) for example "the Parties shall enter into a Contract Agreement within 28 (twenty eight) days after the Contractor receives the Letter of Acceptance, unless they agree otherwise. The Contract Agreement shall be based upon the form in the Particular Conditions. The Contract shall come into full force and effect on the date stated in the Contract Agreement. The costs of stamp duties and similar charges (if any) imposed by law in connection with the Contract Agreement shall be borne by the Employer..."
01.06 ALL: Contract AgreementJerome DunneApproved
ICP Colleagues
Edward Corbett will be asking ICP members to comment.
Edward CorbettApproved
Comments invited
Users of the 1999 Editions of the FIDIC Construction, Plant and Design-Build and EPC/Turnkey Contracts are invited to submit comments with the view to updating the contracts in 2009.
useradminApproved
BodyFilterReplies
Expand/Collapse Category ‎(3)
Expand/Collapse Category01.01 ALL: Definitions ‎(4)
Expand/Collapse Category01.06 ALL: Contract Agreement ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category01.07 ALL: Assignment ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category01.10 ALL: Employer’s Use of Contractor’s Documents ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category01.13 ALL: Compliance with Laws ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category02.05 ALL: Employer’s Claims ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category03.05 TURNKEY: Determinations ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category04.02 ALL: Performance Security ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category04.10 ALL: Site Data ‎(1)
Expand/Collapse Category05.01 CONS: Definition of “nominated Subcontractor” ‎(1)
International Federation of Consulting Engineers
Box 311 - CH-1215 Geneva 15 - Switzerland
Tl +41-22-799 49 05 - Fx +41-22-799 49 01 - fidic@fidic.org - FIDIC.org